Volume 10, Issue 1
Review Article / Published: July 2022
К.Hristov, P. Petrov, O. Gatsev, V. Todorova, K. Petkova, I. Saltirov
Department of Urology and Nephrology, Military Medical Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria
Introduction and objective: The application of ESWL in the treatment of ureteral calculi is to achieve kidney desobstruction with minimal pain, aiming to reduce the need for analgesia and hospital stay. In times of the Covid-19 pandemic by reducing the hospital stay, patients have less contact and it is safer for them from an epidemiological point of view. The objective of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESWL as a method of kidney desobstruction caused of ureteral calculi during Covid-19 pandemic.
Material and methods: A retrospectively collected database of 77 patients, who underwent ESWL for ureteral stones between February 2020 and January 2022 in the Clinic of Endourology and SWL, Military Medical Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria, was reviewed. Data on patients’ preoperative characteristics, stone-free rates, complications and auxiliary procedures were analyzed.
Results: Patients’ mean age was 49.1±12.8 years and male-to-female ratio – 75.3%/24.7%. Mean stone length was 6.5±2 mm and mean stone width was 4.5±1.5 mm. Fifty-two (n=52, 67.5%) of the cases were with stones located in the proximal ureter, in the middle ureter (n=14, 18.2%) and in the distal ureter (n=11, 14.3%). Preoperative drainage with ureteral stent was completed in 13 cases (16.9%). Mean hospital stay was 1.28 days Mean number of SWL hits was 3527±692. Full stone disintegration was observed in 55 patients (71.4%) and partial disintegration was observed in 22 patients (28.6%). Eight (36.4%) of the patients with partial disintegration of the stone needed another ESWL, in 2 (9%) people was performed RIRS afterward and 8 cases (36.4%) required performing an URS at a later stage.
Conclusions: The ESWL as a method of treatment in ureteral calculi has good success rate. With the short hospital stay, it is an appropriate method for times of Covid-19 pandemic. However in some cases, invasive endourological operations such as ureteroscopy could not be avoided in order to be achieved full kidney desobstruction.
- Петкова К, Салтиров И. Проспективно сравнително проучване на уретероскопия срещу екстракорпорална литотрипсия при конкременти в проксимална трета на уретера с размери 5-10 мм. Ендоурология и минимално инвазивна хирургия. 2018; 6(1): 12-16.
- Scotland KB, Tailly T, Chew BH, Bhojani N, Smith D; TOWER Initiative. Consensus Statement on Urinary Stone Treatment During a Pandemic: A Delphi Process from the Endourological Society TOWER Research Initiative. J Endourol. 2022 Mar;36(3):335-344. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0477. PMID: 35019782.
- Lopes Neto AC, Korkes F, Silva JL 2nd, Amarante RD, Mattos MH, Tobias-Machado M, Pompeo AC. Prospective randomized study of treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureterolithotripsy versus laparoscopy. J Urol. 2012 Jan;187(1):164-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.054. Epub 2011 Nov 17. PMID: 22100003.
- Lingeman JE, Shirrell WL, Newman DM, Mosbaugh PG, Steele RE, Woods JR. Management of upper ureteral calculi with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 1987 Oct;138(4):720-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43351-9. PMID: 3656518.
- Gettman MT, Segura JW. Management of ureteric stones: issues and controversies. BJU Int. 2005 Mar;95 Suppl 2:85-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05206.x. PMID: 15720341.
- Davidoff K, Popov E, Zlatanov D, Roglev V. Urgent ESWL as first line treatment for kidney decompession in the setting of acute renal colic. Eur Urol Suppl 2016; 15(6):179 doi:10.1016/S1569-9056(16)15140-1
- Петкова К., Петрова Д., Петров П., Гъцев О., Христофоров С., Салтиров И. Уретероскопия по спешност при пациенти с остро бъбречно увреждане свързано с обструкция от конкремент в уретера. Ендоурология и минимално инвазивна хирургия. 2020; 8(2):22-26
- Petkova K, Petrova D, Petrov P, Hristoforov S, Gatsev O, Saltirov I. Emergency ureteroscopy as first-line treatment in patients with acute kidney injury due to ureteral stones. Poster presented at EAU UROtech: A joint meeting of the EAU Section for Uro-Technology and the EAU Section of Urolithiasis in collaboration with the EAU Robotic Urology Section, 25-28 May 2022, Istanbul, Turkey
- Farag M, Jack GS, Wong LM, Bolton DM, Lenaghan D. What is the best way to manage ureteric calculi in the time of COVID-19? A comparison of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) in an Australian health-care setting. BJUI Compass. 2020 Nov 7;2(2):92-96. doi: 10.1002/bco2.55. PMID: 35474891; PMCID: PMC8988776.
- Anagnostou T, Tolley D. Management of ureteric stones. Eur Urol. 2004 Jun;45(6):714-21. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.10.018. PMID: 15149742.
- Uguz S, Senkul T, Soydan H, Ates F, Akyol I, Malkoc E, Baykal KV. Immediate or delayed SWL in ureteric stones: a prospective and randomized study. Urol Res. 2012 Dec;40(6):739-44. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0490-2. Epub 2012 Jul 5. PMID: 22763796.
- Kurkar A, Elderwy AA, Osman MM, Abdelkawi IF, Shalaby MM, Abdelhafez MF. Predictors of successful emergency shock wave lithotripsy for acute renal colic. Urolithiasis. 2022 Aug;50(4):481-485. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01332-3. Epub 2022 Jun 3. PMID: 35657411; PMCID: PMC9300550.
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, ureteral stones, Covid 19
How to cite this article:
Hristov K, Petrov P, Gatsev O, Todorova V, Petkova К, Saltirov I. ESWL as a method for kidney decompression in treatment of ureteral calculi during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Endourology and Minimally Invasive Surgery (Bulgaria), 2022; 10(1):39-42
Dr. Konstantin Hristov
Department of Urology and Nephrology; Military Medical Academy Sofia
Address: Blvd“ Georgi Sofiiski” 3; Sofia-1606, Bulgaria
E-mail: konstantin.hristovv @ gmail.com