Site Overlay

Efficacy and safety of emergency ureteroscopy as first-line treatment for patients with renal obstruction due to ureteral stones in the COVID-19 pandemic

By Boris

Volume 10, Issue 1

Review Article / Published: July 2022

DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.57045/jemis/1010722.pp33-38

V. Todorova, O. Gatsev, P. Petrov, K. Hristov, K. Petkova, I. Saltirov

Department of Urology and Nephrology, Military Medical Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria

Abstract

Introduction and objective: Acute renal colic due to ureteral calculi is a common urological emergency that can be managed conservatively, by providing renal drainage and medical management of the pain syndrome followed by planned treatment, or by emergency surgery. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic leading to the temporary suspension of elective surgical activity, emergency ureteroscopy has become a valuable modality for the treatment of acute renal obstruction.

 The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of emergency ureteroscopy as first-line treatment for patients with acute renal obstruction due to ureteral stones during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Material and methods: A prospectively collected database of 120 patients with acute renal obstruction due to ureteral stone who underwent emergency ureteroscopy within 24 hours from hospitalization between March 2020 and December 2021, was reviewed. Data on patients’ preoperative characteristics, stone-free rates and complication rates was analyzed.

Results: Patients’ mean age was 51.4±15.2 years. Male-to-female ratio was 73.3%/26.7%. Mean preoperative serum creatinine values were 120.1±64.1 umol/l. 33 patients (2.5%) had a solitary functioning kidney. Stone location was proximal ureter in 3 patients (27.5%), mid-ureter – in 12 (10%), distal ureter – in 73 (60.8%), distal and proximal ureter – in 2 cases (1.6%). Mean stone size was 8.1±3.3 mm. Stone-free rate after a single procedure was 95% and mean operative time – 25.1±11.5 min. Postoperative drainage was stent JJ in 34 (28.3%) and ureteral catheter for 12h – in 22 (18.3%) patients. 21 patients (17.5%) had a narrow ureter, necessitating the use of smaller caliber ureteroscope (6 Fr). In 2 patients (1.7%) the ureter could not be accessed and a stent JJ was inserted. Intraoperative complications were present in 5 cases – 1 ureteral perforation (0.8%) and 4 cases of upward stone migration (3.3%). Postoperative complications were fever in 2 patients (1.7%) and postoperative renal colic pain – in 7 (5.8%).

Conclusions: The results of this prospective study suggest that emergency ureteroscopy is a safe and effective first-line treatment for acute renal obstruction due to ureteral stones. It offers one-stage management, without the potential complications of obstruction and loss of renal function due to delayed treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic.

References

  1. The British Association of Urological Surgeons. I think I might have…. 2022. Available from: https://www.baus.org.uk/patients/conditions/6/kidney_stones/ (last accessed March 14, 2022).
  2. Shafi H, Moazzami B, Pourghasem M, Kasaeian A. An overview of treatment options for urinary stones. Caspian J Intern Med. 2016 Winter;7(1):1-6. PMID: 26958325; PMCID: PMC4761115.
  3. Wright PJ, English PJ, Hungin AP, Marsden SN. Managing acute renal colic across the primary-secondary care interface: a pathway of care based on evidence and consensus. BMJ. 2002 Dec 14;325(7377):1408-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7377.1408. Erratum in: BMJ. 2003 Jan 4;326(7379):18. PMID: 12480861; PMCID: PMC1124863.
  4. Youn JH, Kim SS, Yu JH, Sung LH, Noh CH, Chung JY. Efficacy and safety of emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral calculi. Korean J Urol. 2012 Sep;53(9):632-5. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.9.632. Epub 2012 Sep 19. PMID: 23061001; PMCID: PMC3460006.
  5. Gökce Mİ, Yin S, Sönmez MG, Eryildirim B, Kallidonis P, Petkova K, Guven S, Kiremit MC, de Lorenzis E, Tefik T, Villa L, Zeng G, Sarica K. How does the COVID-19 pandemic affect the preoperative evaluation and anesthesia applied for urinary stones? EULIS eCORE-IAU multicenter collaborative cohort study. Urolithiasis. 2020 Aug;48(4):345-351. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01193-8. Epub 2020 May 20. PMID: 32436005; PMCID: PMC7239347.
  6. Elashry OM, Elgamasy AK, Sabaa MA, Abo-Elenien M, Omar MA, Eltatawy HH, El-Abd SA. Ureteroscopic management of lower ureteric calculi: a 15-year single-centre experience. BJU Int. 2008 Sep;102(8):1010-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07747.x. Epub 2008 May 15. PMID: 18485033.
  7. Mckay A, Somani BK, Pietropaolo A, Geraghty R, Whitehurst L, Kyriakides R, Aboumarzouk OM. Comparison of Primary and Delayed Ureteroscopy for Ureteric Stones: A Prospective Non-Randomized Comparative Study. Urol Int. 2021;105(1-2):90-94. doi: 10.1159/000510213. Epub 2020 Sep 7. PMID: 32894854.
  8. Flammia S, Salciccia S, Tufano A, Busetto GM, Ricciuti GP, Sciarra A. How urinary stone emergencies changed in the time of COVID-19? Urolithiasis. 2020 Oct;48(5):467-469. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01198-3. Epub 2020 May 28. PMID: 32468127; PMCID: PMC7255446.
  9. Al-Terki A, Alkabbani M, Alenezi TA, Al-Shaiji TF, Al-Mousawi S, El-Nahas AR. Emergency vs elective ureteroscopy for a single ureteric stone. Arab J Urol. 2020 Aug 25;19(2):137-140. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2020.1813004. PMID: 34104487; PMCID: PMC8158266.
  10. Guercio S, Ambu A, Mangione F, Mari M, Vacca F, Bellina M. Randomized prospective trial comparing immediate versus delayed ureteroscopy for patients with ureteral calculi and normal renal function who present to the emergency department. J Endourol. 2011 Jul;25(7):1137-41. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0554. Epub 2011 Jun 17. PMID: 21682597
  11. Picozzi SC, Ricci C, Gaeta M, Casellato S, Stubinski R, Bozzini G, Pace G, Macchi A, Carmignani L. Urgent ureteroscopy as first-line treatment for ureteral stones: a meta-analysis of 681 patients. Urol Res. 2012 Oct;40(5):581-6. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0469-z. Epub 2012 Feb 25. PMID: 22367457.
  12. Osorio L, Lima E, Soares J, Autorino R, Versos R, Lhamas A, Marcelo F. Emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones: why not? Urology. 2007 Jan;69(1):27-31; discussion 31-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1116. PMID: 17270606.
  13. Христофоров С, Гъцев О, Петров П, Петкова К, Петрова Д, Салтиров И. Сравнително проучване между уретероскопия в спешен и планов порядък при пациенти с обструкция дължаща се на уретерален конкремент. Ендоурология и минимално инвазивна хирургия. 2018; 6(2): 26-32.
  14. Петкова К., Петрова Д., Петров П., Гъцев О., Христофоров С., Салтиров И.. Уретероскопия по спешност при пациенти с остро бъбречно увреждане свързано с обструкция от конкремент в уретера. Ендоурология и минимално инвазивна хирургия. 2020; 8(2):22-26
  15. Yang S, Qian H, Song C, Xia Y, Cheng F, Zhang C. Emergency ureteroscopic treatment for upper urinary tract calculi obstruction associated with acute renal failure: feasible or not? J Endourol. 2010 Nov;24(11):1721-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0420. Epub 2010 Oct 19. PMID: 20958134.
Click to review Volume 10, Issue 1
Article [pdf]

Keywords:

Ureterorenoscopy, Ureteral obstruction, Ureteral stone, COVID-19

How to cite this article:

Todorova V, Gatsev O, Petrov P, Hristov K, Petkova K, Saltirov  I. Efficacy and safety of emergency ureteroscopy as first-line treatment for patients with renal obstruction due to ureteral stones in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Endourology and Minimally Invasive Surgery (Bulgaria), 2022; 10(1):33.-38

Corresponding author:

Dr. Victoria Todorova

Military Medical Academy, Sofia; Department of Urology and Nephrology; Clinic of Endourology and SWL

Address: Blvd“ Georgi Sofiiski” 3; Sofia-1606, Bulgaria

E-mail: v.todorova0803 @ gmail.com