Site Overlay

Our experience with the applicationof the extraperitoneal laparoscopicburch colposuspension

Volume 12, Issue 1

Original Article / Published: December 2024

DOI:

V. Terzi

Division of Urology, Clinic of Surgery, Naval Hospital of Varna, Military Medical Academy of Sofia

Abstract

Introduction: Recently, there is a considerable interest of the scientific community in the operative treatment of the female stress urinary incontinence, as until 2009, more than 200 surgical techniques have been described. Burch colposuspension and pubovaginal slings are recommended in the recent guidelines of the European Association of Urology.
Aim: We describe an extraperitoneal laparoscopic Burch colposuspension modified by us for the operative treatment of the female stress urinary incontinence. Material and Methods: During the period between November 2017 and August 2024, we operated on a total of 27 female patients in the Division of Urology and Gynecology, Clinic of Surgery of the Naval Hospital of Varna, Military Medical Academy of Sofia. They were at a mean age of 56,04±11,22 years (range, 36 to 75 years).
Results: Postoperative period was comparatively short. The patients were discharged with a considerable clinical improvement.
Conclusion: Our results enable us to draw the conclusion that the extraperitoneal laparoscopic Burch colposuspension modified by us is safe and effective. It could more widely be applied in the Bulgarian urological practice.

References

  1. Hinoul P, Roovers JP, Ombelet W, et al. Surgical management of urinary stress incontinence in women: a historical and clinical overview. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;145(2):219-225.
  2. Бечев Б, Магунска Н, Иванов С, и др. Лапароскопска колпосуспенсия по Бърч с паравагинална корекция. Акуш гинекол. 2016;55(3):21-23.
  3. Akdemir Y, Dincer F, Buyukuysal C, et al. Comparison of outcomes of Burch colposuspension and transobturator tape and single incision needleless procedures for the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence patients who underwent combined pelvic reconstructive surgery or hysterectomy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2020;52(9):1665-1673.
  4. Aleksandrov A, Meshulam M, Rabischong B, et al. Laparoscopic TOT-like Burch colposuspension: back to the future? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(1):24-25
  5. Burkhard FC, Bosch JLHR, Cruz F, et al. EAU-guidelines urinary incontinence presented at the EAU Annual Congress, Amsterdam, 2020. Arnhem, EAU Guidelines Office, 2020.
  6. Chang OH, Cadish LA, Kailasam A, et al. Impact of the availability of midurethral slings on treatment strategies for stress urinary incontinence: a cost-effectiveness analysis. BJOG. 2022;129(3):500-508.
  7. Chen Y, Zhang C, Yang S, et al. Long-term outcomes of surgical interventions for stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2024;110(1):520-528.
  8. Elmohamady BN, Sherif HW, Mohammed SA, et al. Comparative study of two techniques of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension using sutures versus MESH in women with genuine stress urinary incontinence. Arab J Urol. 2024;2 (2):121-128.
  9. Fahrni AC, Betschart C, de la Jolinière JB, et al. A new titanium-covered transobturator tape for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(4):911- 918.
  10. Hamidi Alamdari D, Douzandeh A, Keshvari Shirvan M, et al. Mixed treatment for same-severe mixed urinary incontinence: a novel method. Clin Case Rep. 2024;12(3):e8579. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.8579.
  11. Lo TS, Shailaja N, Tan YL, et al. Outcomes and failure risks in mid-urethral sling insertion in elderly and old age with urodynamic stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(4):717- 726.
  12. Marquini GV, Bella ZIKJD, Sartori MGF. Burch procedure: a historical perspective. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022;44(5):511- 518.
  13. Obaid AA, Al-Hamzawi SA, Alwan AA. Laparoscopic and open Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence: advantages and disadvantages. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2022;29(2):e20-e26.
  14. Pannek J, Wöllner J. Management of stress urinary incontinence in female patients with spinal cord injury by autologous fascial sling: time for a revival? Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2022;8(1):57. doi: 10.1038/s41394-022-00524 8.
  15. Petros P, Palma P. Conceptualizing stress urinary incontinence surgery beyond midurethral slings: very early results from simplified ligament repair without tapes. Neurourol Urodyn. 2023;42(2):383-388.

Keywords:

stress urinary incontinence, modified extraperitoneal laparoscopic Burch colposuspension, operative treatment, effectiveness

How to cite this article:

V.Terzi. Our experience with the application of the extraperitoneal laparoscopic burch colposuspension; Journal of Endourology and Minimally invasive surgery, 2024; 12(1): 38-42

Corresponding author:

Vasil Terzi, M.D. Division of Urology, Clinic of Surgery Naval Hospital of Varna Military Medical Academy of Sofia
e-mail: v_terzi@yahoo.com; Phone: 0899871021